Running a nonprofit comes with a unique set of challenges, especially when it comes to financial accountability. Donors, boards, and regulators want transparency, but what does that actually mean in terms of audits?
Here’s a detailed breakdown of the main types of audits a nonprofit might face (or choose), and when each one is necessary.
An independent CPA reviews and expresses an opinion on your financial statements' accuracy, ensuring they comply with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
Required by law in some states based on revenue thresholds.
Often required by major donors, foundations, or government funders.
Best practice for organizations with over ~$500K in annual revenue or growing complexity.
This is the gold standard for financial transparency. It gives boards, funders, and the public confidence in how you manage money.
A detailed review of your financial statements, including balance sheets, income statements, and cash flow.
Interviews with management and testing of financial records.
A final audit report with the auditor’s opinion.
A specialized audit required when your nonprofit spends $750,000 or more in federal funds in a fiscal year. It includes both a financial audit and a review of your compliance with federal grant rules.
Automatically required if you spend $750,000 or more in federal funds.
Even if you only receive pass-through funds (from state/local governments), you may still be subject.
Failing to comply can result in grant clawbacks, reputational harm, or funding ineligibility.
Financial review focused on federal funds.
A compliance test to ensure you are following federal rules.
Reporting to federal oversight bodies.
An audit focused on a particular program, grant, or restricted fund to ensure it’s being managed and reported properly.
Required by some grantors (especially private foundations).
Helpful when dealing with complex or high-dollar programs.
It provides funders with assurance that their money is being used exactly as intended.
Verification of spending against the grant agreement.
Checks on program outcomes and performance metrics.
A review of internal controls, policies, and operational practices, usually done by an internal team or outsourced consultant, not just financial.
When scaling up operations.
After leadership turnover.
If fraud risks or inefficiencies are suspected.
As a proactive governance move.
It helps you catch weaknesses in processes before they lead to bigger issues.
Assessment of financial controls, policies, and procedures.
Recommendations for improving efficiency and reducing risks.
Not a full audit, but a customized review of specific items—like expense reports, grant compliance, or fund transfers—based on what the nonprofit and auditor agree to.
If you want assurance on something specific without a full audit.
For internal board requests or specific donor concerns.
It’s a flexible, cost-effective way to get targeted insights.
Specific procedures based on your request (e.g., testing a few transactions, reviewing specific reports).
A brief report with findings, but no full audit opinion.
Not every nonprofit needs a full audit every year. But many will need some form of assurance, especially as they grow or start handling larger grants.
Are we hitting any state or federal thresholds?
Are funders asking for one?
Is the board requesting more oversight?
Have we grown quickly or changed key staff?
Getting ahead of audit expectations now can save you major headaches (and credibility loss) later. Even if it’s not legally required, an audit or review can be a strong signal of transparency and good governance.
We help organizations assess risk, stay compliant, and prepare for audits without getting buried in complexity. Let’s make sure your audit process supports your mission, not distracts from it.
Copyright 2022 - RNB Capital LLC - All Rights Reserved